arXiv:2611.09971v1 cs.CV

Clinically Informed Colour Encoding Improves the Localisation and Stability of Explanations in Deep Learning ECG Models: External Validation in a UK Biobank Epilepsy Cohort

Lauren Hutchinson, Moses Nkgari, Alaa Alahmadi

제출 2026-11-10

원문 초록

Objective: It is not known whether the input representation governs the quality of explanations of deep learning models for electrocardiogram analysis. Risk of dangerous ventricular repolarisation is judged from the QT-interval and the shape of the T-wave, features that are hard to assess visually and harder still to verify in a model's reasoning. We evaluate a pseudo-colour encoding filling the area beneath the QT interval, its colour sequence designed from clinical electrophysiology knowledge and mapped to a validated risk prediction model, the QT-nomogram. Methods: Two identically configured residual networks were trained on single-heartbeat images from a clinical trial, differing only in whether pseudo-colour encoding was applied, so that any difference is attributable to the chromatic channel alone. To externally validate the effect, both models were applied without fine-tuning or threshold tuning to a previously unseen epilepsy cohort from the UK-Biobank at two visits, and eight explanation methods compared on faithfulness, localisation and stability. Results: The pseudo-colour model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.903 and 0.914 at the first and follow-up visits, against 0.719 and 0.720 for the monochrome model, recovering three to five times as many at-risk heartbeats at comparable specificity. Pseudo-colour encoding improved explanation localisation and stability for almost every method, and the improvement reproduced across both visits. Conclusion: The input representation is a controllable and previously overlooked determinant of both predictive performance and explanation quality. Significance: Treating interpretability as a representation-design problem offers a route towards explanations clinicians can check against known electrophysiology.

제출 이력

확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.

  1. arXiv:2611.09971v1제출 시각 미확인

함께 살펴볼 논문

공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.

공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.

토론

이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.