원문 초록
Large language models are increasingly used for subjective tasks such as seeking advice, where there is often no single correct answer. Yet dominant alignment methods learn a single behavior policy that applies uniformly across users, limiting their ability to reflect individual value priorities. We propose personalized value alignment, a framework for adapting model responses to users' stable value profiles rather than to personas, demographics, or task-specific preferences used in prior personalization work. Our approach represents users through Schwartz value profiles and selects which of their values are relevant to each query before applying targeted prompting, activation steering, or LoRA-DPO. We create a dataset of 1,501 value-tension scenarios and evaluate over 152 diverse value profiles sampled from a nationally representative survey. Value-targeted methods outperform no-personalization, demographic, and full-profile prompting baselines, indicating that gains come from focused conditioning on query-specific value priorities rather than mere exposure. We further find that steering effects are not uniform across users: alignment gains vary by where a user's priorities fall in the value space. Combining targeted prompting with activation steering or LoRA-DPO yields the strongest personalization while keeping logical quality within adequate range.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2611.09919v1제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.