arXiv:2611.09892v1 cs.RO

On Agentic Manipulation Policies

Chen Chen, Omid Bagherieh, Naveen Nikamanth Appiah Balaji, Jesse T. Gonzalez, Negin Heravi, Fahad Islam, Xueting Li, Jean-Baptiste Regli, Kejia Ren, Petr \v{S}vec, David J. Yoon, Matthias M\"uller, Vladlen Koltun

제출 2026-11-09

원문 초록

Recent work on robot manipulation has focused on specialist policies trained on demonstrations. We show that generalist AI models can control manipulators more reliably than specialist policies such as vision-language-action models (VLAs) and world-action models (WAMs). We systematically analyze agentic manipulation policies (AMPs), in which a generalist AI model commands the manipulator directly, adapting its actions as the task unfolds. We present AMP1, a reference harness that runs unchanged across single-arm, bimanual, and mobile manipulation. AMP1 achieves state-of-the-art results on the RoboLab-120 and CaP-Gym benchmarks, with no demonstrations or task-specific training. On RoboLab-120, AMP1 reaches an 85.6\% success rate zero-shot, compared to 49.2\% and 42.9\% for leading VLA and WAM policies. The agent succeeds zero-shot in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances, reducing failure rates by 20x and 15x relative to strong VLA and WAM baselines. The basic harness supplies no grasping, pushing, or placing skills; the agent develops its own strategies, such as searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating its cameras. With the addition of a persistent memory store, the agent can also learn from experience: an augmented harness with a memory representation that is carried across episodes lowers the failure rate on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment. Our analysis suggests that AMPs are substantially more general and robust than specialist manipulation policies, providing a promising foundation for robot manipulation.

제출 이력

확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.

  1. arXiv:2611.09892v1제출 시각 미확인

함께 살펴볼 논문

공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.

공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.

토론

이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.