원문 초록
Proximity-inducing drugs, including PROTACs, represent a promising therapeutic modality. Their activity is driven by the geometry of the assembled ternary complex, which determines whether the target is ubiquitinated. Co-folding models perform poorly in these cases due to scarcity of training data and the dynamic nature of such complexes. Structural proteomics can supply the missing geometric information and steer the model towards an accurate prediction. However, current models accept only positive signals, while a differential structural mass-spectrometry experiment also reports negative signals. We introduce AIMS-Fold, an inference-time guidance layer built on Boltz-2 that requires no retraining and accepts repulsive constraints alongside attractive ones. We tested AIMS-Fold on 28 PROTAC, glue and antibody complexes that Boltz-2 fails to predict. From only five generated models, guidance recovers the correct conformation in 64% of cases. The gap does not close with scale: across 100 models and 20 seeds, unguided Boltz-2 reaches 14% while AIMS-Fold reaches 86%. Repulsive constraints alone recover the correct conformation on some systems, occasionally exceeding the matched attractive constraints. Taken together, these results demonstrate the strength of utilizing the full structural proteomics signal, positive and negative, to steer generative models toward the correct conformation, addressing a central problem in rational degrader design.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2605.26192v2제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.