The Range Shrinks, the Threat Remains: Re-evaluating LLM Package Hallucinations on the 2026 Frontier-Model Cohort
원문 초록
Package hallucinations, LLM-generated references to packages that do not exist, enable slopsquatting: an attacker registers the hallucinated name. We replicate Spracklen et al. (USENIX Security '25) on five 2026 frontier models over 199,840 Python and JavaScript generations. This version reports a preregistered live revalidation that replaces the static package lists of earlier versions with two independent checks against the live PyPI and npm registries. Hallucination rates are 3.6-5.0% of package mentions (2.2-3.4% of generations): the 2026 frontier sits at the level of 2024's commercial models, and the open-weight gap seen in 2024 has disappeared. Python exceeds JavaScript for every model. The set of names hallucinated by all five models shrinks from the 127 reported earlier to 104; 26 earlier entries were correct import statements whose module name differs from the package name. Using the accidental six-month public exposure of our own list as a natural experiment, we find no detectable effect of publication: about 1% of hallucinated names were registered within six months, at the same rate for published and unpublished names, and the 95% interval excludes increases above 2.5 percentage points. Still, at least 23 package names that the models suggest had previously hosted malware later removed by the registries, and one hallucinated name was registered with malware after our runs.
제출 이력
확인된 버전만 표시합니다. 전체 제출 이력은 arXiv 원문에서 확인하세요.
- arXiv:2605.17062v4제출 시각 미확인
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
공통 태그로 연결된 공개 논문이 아직 없습니다.
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.