Aligned Textual Scoring Rules
원문 초록
Scoring rules elicit probabilistic predictions from a strategic agent by scoring the prediction against a ground truth state. A scoring rule is proper if, from the agent's perspective, reporting the true belief maximizes the expected score. With the development of language models, Wu and Hartline (2024) proposes a reduction from textual information elicitation to the numerical (i.e. probabilistic) information elicitation problem, which achieves provable properness for textual elicitation. However, not all proper scoring rules are well aligned with human preference over text. Our paper designs the Aligned Scoring rule (ASR) for text by optimizing and minimizing the mean squared error between a proper scoring rule and a reference score (e.g. human score). Our experiments show that our ASR outperforms previous methods in aligning with human preference while maintaining properness.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
h-calibration: Rethinking Classifier Recalibration with Probabilistic Error-Bounded Objective
Enforcing tail calibration when training probabilistic forecast models
Harnessing Superclasses for Learning from Hierarchical Databases
Bayesian Autoregressive Online Change-Point Detection with Time-Varying Parameters
Improving probabilistic forecasts of extreme wind speeds by training statistical post-processing models with weighted scoring rules
Distributional Regression U-Nets for the Postprocessing of Precipitation Ensemble Forecasts
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.