Comparison of ConvNeXt and Vision-Language Models for Breast Density Assessment in Screening Mammography
원문 초록
Mammographic breast density classification is essential for cancer risk assessment but remains challenging due to subjective interpretation and inter-observer variability. This study compares multimodal and CNN-based methods for automated classification using the BI-RADS system, evaluating BioMedCLIP and ConvNeXt across three learning scenarios: zero-shot classification, linear probing with textual descriptions, and fine-tuning with numerical labels. Results show that zero-shot classification achieved modest performance, while the fine-tuned ConvNeXt model outperformed the BioMedCLIP linear probe. Although linear probing demonstrated potential with pretrained embeddings, it was less effective than full fine-tuning. These findings suggest that despite the promise of multimodal learning, CNN-based models with end-to-end fine-tuning provide stronger performance for specialized medical imaging. The study underscores the need for more detailed textual representations and domain-specific adaptations in future radiology applications.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
GeoVision Labeler: Zero-Shot Geospatial Classification with Vision and Language Models
On the effectiveness of Large Language Models in the mechanical design domain
DEARLi: Decoupled Enhancement of Recognition and Localization for Semi-supervised Panoptic Segmentation
Efficient Medical Vision-Language Alignment Through Adapting Masked Vision Models
AmorLIP: Efficient Language-Image Pretraining via Amortization
Uniformity First: Uniformity-aware Test-time Adaptation of Vision-language Models against Image Corruption
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.