Intelligibility of Text-to-Speech Systems for Mathematical Expressions
원문 초록
There has been limited evaluation of advanced Text-to-Speech (TTS) models with Mathematical eXpressions (MX) as inputs. In this work, we design experiments to evaluate quality and intelligibility of five TTS models through listening and transcribing tests for various categories of MX. We use two Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate English pronunciation from LaTeX MX as TTS models cannot process LaTeX directly. We use Mean Opinion Score from user ratings and quantify intelligibility through transcription correctness using three metrics. We also compare listener preference of TTS outputs with respect to human expert rendition of same MX. Results establish that output of TTS models for MX is not necessarily intelligible, the gap in intelligibility varies across TTS models and MX category. For most categories, performance of TTS models is significantly worse than that of expert rendition. The effect of choice of LLM is limited. This establishes the need to improve TTS models for MX.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
ZipVoice-Dialog: Non-Autoregressive Spoken Dialogue Generation with Flow Matching
Differentiable Reward Optimization for LLM based TTS system
PresentAgent: Multimodal Agent for Presentation Video Generation
RapFlow-TTS: Rapid and High-Fidelity Text-to-Speech with Improved Consistency Flow Matching
InstructTTSEval: Benchmarking Complex Natural-Language Instruction Following in Text-to-Speech Systems
ZipVoice: Fast and High-Quality Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech with Flow Matching
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.