A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairs
원문 초록
Existing benchmarks for assessing the spatio-temporal understanding and reasoning abilities of video language models are susceptible to score inflation due to the presence of shortcut solutions based on superficial visual or textual cues. This paper mitigates the challenges in accurately assessing model performance by introducing the Minimal Video Pairs (MVP) benchmark, a simple shortcut-aware video QA benchmark for assessing the physical understanding of video language models. The benchmark is comprised of 55K high-quality multiple-choice video QA examples focusing on physical world understanding. Examples are curated from nine video data sources, spanning first-person egocentric and exocentric videos, robotic interaction data, and cognitive science intuitive physics benchmarks. To mitigate shortcut solutions that rely on superficial visual or textual cues and biases, each sample in MVP has a minimal-change pair -- a visually similar video accompanied by an identical question but an opposing answer. To answer a question correctly, a model must provide correct answers for both examples in the minimal-change pair; as such, models that solely rely on visual or textual biases would achieve below random performance. Human performance on MVP is 92.9\%, while the best open-source state-of-the-art video-language model achieves 40.2\% compared to random performance at 25\%.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Training-free LLM Merging for Multi-task Learning
STSBench: A Spatio-temporal Scenario Benchmark for Multi-modal Large Language Models in Autonomous Driving
LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation
Polishing Every Facet of the GEM: Testing Linguistic Competence of LLMs and Humans in Korean
Mixed-R1: Unified Reward Perspective For Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models
Simulating Training Data Leakage in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for LLM Evaluation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.