A Multi-Dataset Evaluation of Models for Automated Vulnerability Repair
원문 초록
Software vulnerabilities pose significant security threats, requiring effective mitigation. While Automated Program Repair (APR) has advanced in fixing general bugs, vulnerability patching, a security-critical aspect of APR remains underexplored. This study investigates pre-trained language models, CodeBERT and CodeT5, for automated vulnerability patching across six datasets and four languages. We evaluate their accuracy and generalization to unknown vulnerabilities. Results show that while both models face challenges with fragmented or sparse context, CodeBERT performs comparatively better in such scenarios, whereas CodeT5 excels in capturing complex vulnerability patterns. CodeT5 also demonstrates superior scalability. Furthermore, we test fine-tuned models on both in-distribution (trained) and out-of-distribution (unseen) datasets. While fine-tuning improves in-distribution performance, models struggle to generalize to unseen data, highlighting challenges in robust vulnerability detection. This study benchmarks model performance, identifies limitations in generalization, and provides actionable insights to advance automated vulnerability patching for real-world security applications.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CORE: Benchmarking LLMs Code Reasoning Capabilities through Static Analysis Tasks
Using ML filters to help automated vulnerability repairs: when it helps and when it doesn't
To Err is Machine: Vulnerability Detection Challenges LLM Reasoning
Boosting Vulnerability Detection of LLMs via Curriculum Preference Optimization with Synthetic Reasoning Data
SV-TrustEval-C: Evaluating Structure and Semantic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Source Code Vulnerability Analysis
CRAKEN: Cybersecurity LLM Agent with Knowledge-Based Execution
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.