BehaviorBox: Automated Discovery of Fine-Grained Performance Differences Between Language Models
원문 초록
Language model evaluation is a daunting task: prompts are brittle, corpus-level perplexities are vague, and the choice of benchmarks are endless. Finding examples that show meaningful, generalizable differences between two LMs is crucial to understanding where one model succeeds and another fails. Can this process be done automatically? In this work, we propose methodology for automated comparison of language models that uses performance-aware contextual embeddings to find fine-grained features of text where one LM outperforms another. Our method, which we name BehaviorBox, extracts coherent features that demonstrate differences with respect to the ease of generation between two LMs. Specifically, BehaviorBox finds features that describe groups of words in fine-grained contexts, such as "conditional 'were' in the phrase 'if you were'" and "exclamation marks after emotional statements", where one model outperforms another within a particular datatset. We apply BehaviorBox to compare models that vary in size, model family, and post-training, and enumerate insights into specific contexts that illustrate meaningful differences in performance which cannot be found by measures such as corpus-level perplexity alone.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FABLE: A Novel Data-Flow Analysis Benchmark on Procedural Text for Large Language Model Evaluation
Role-Playing Evaluation for Large Language Models
M-ABSA: A Multilingual Dataset for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis
Environmental large language model Evaluation (ELLE) dataset: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generative AI applications in Eco-environment Domain
Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation
Template Matters: Understanding the Role of Instruction Templates in Multimodal Language Model Evaluation and Training
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.