Do Language Models Mirror Human Confidence? Exploring Psychological Insights to Address Overconfidence in LLMs
원문 초록
Psychology research has shown that humans are poor at estimating their performance on tasks, tending towards underconfidence on easy tasks and overconfidence on difficult tasks. We examine three LLMs, Llama-3-70B-instruct, Claude-3-Sonnet, and GPT-4o, on a range of QA tasks of varying difficulty, and show that models exhibit subtle differences from human patterns of overconfidence: less sensitive to task difficulty, and when prompted to answer based on different personas -- e.g., expert vs layman, or different race, gender, and ages -- the models will respond with stereotypically biased confidence estimations even though their underlying answer accuracy remains the same. Based on these observations, we propose Answer-Free Confidence Estimation (AFCE) to improve confidence calibration and LLM interpretability in these settings. AFCE is a self-assessment method that employs two stages of prompting, first eliciting only confidence scores on questions, then asking separately for the answer. Experiments on the MMLU and GPQA datasets spanning subjects and difficulty show that this separation of tasks significantly reduces overconfidence and delivers more human-like sensitivity to task difficulty.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gains
Growing Transformers: Modular Composition and Layer-wise Expansion on a Frozen Substrate
any4: Learned 4-bit Numeric Representation for LLMs
Emergent Semantics Beyond Token Embeddings: Transformer LMs with Frozen Visual Unicode Representations
Simulating Training Data Leakage in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for LLM Evaluation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.