Why is it easier to predict the epidemic curve than to reconstruct the underlying contact network?
원문 초록
We study the deterministic Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) epidemic model on weighted graphs. In their numerical study [10] van Mieghem et al. have shown that it is possible to learn an estimated network from a finite time sample of the trajectories of the dynamics that in turn can give an accurate prediction beyond the sample time range, even though the estimated network might be qualitatively far from the ground truth. We give a mathematically rigorous derivation for this phenomenon, notably that for large networks, prediction of the epidemic curves is robust, while reconstructing the underlying network is ill-conditioned. Furthermore, we also provide an explicit formula for the underlying network when reconstruction is possible. At the heart of the explanation, we rely on Szemer\'edi's weak regularity lemma.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Identifying the Smallest Adversarial Load Perturbations that Render DC-OPF Infeasible
Distributed Lyapunov Functions for Nonlinear Networks
Optimization over Sparse Support-Preserving Sets: Two-Step Projection with Global Optimality Guarantees
Know When to Abstain: Optimal Selective Classification with Likelihood Ratios
Vulnerability of Transfer-Learned Neural Networks to Data Reconstruction Attacks in Small-Data Regime
Lean Formalization of Generalization Error Bound by Rademacher Complexity
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.