Enhancing Marker Scoring Accuracy through Ordinal Confidence Modelling in Educational Assessments
원문 초록
A key ethical challenge in Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is ensuring that scores are only released when they meet high reliability standards. Confidence modelling addresses this by assigning a reliability estimate measure, in the form of a confidence score, to each automated score. In this study, we frame confidence estimation as a classification task: predicting whether an AES-generated score correctly places a candidate in the appropriate CEFR level. While this is a binary decision, we leverage the inherent granularity of the scoring domain in two ways. First, we reformulate the task as an n-ary classification problem using score binning. Second, we introduce a set of novel Kernel Weighted Ordinal Categorical Cross Entropy (KWOCCE) loss functions that incorporate the ordinal structure of CEFR labels. Our best-performing model achieves an F1 score of 0.97, and enables the system to release 47% of scores with 100% CEFR agreement and 99% with at least 95% CEFR agreement -compared to approximately 92% (approx.) CEFR agreement from the standalone AES model where we release all AM predicted scores.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Beyond Agreement: Diagnosing the Rationale Alignment of Automated Essay Scoring Methods based on Linguistically-informed Counterfactuals
Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation
Autoregressive Score Generation for Multi-trait Essay Scoring
Can Large Language Models Automatically Score Proficiency of Written Essays?
VerAs: Verify then Assess STEM Lab Reports
Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.