Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Lung Cancer Mutation Detection and Staging Using 3D CT Scans
원문 초록
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and non-invasive methods for detecting key mutations and staging are essential for improving patient outcomes. Here, we compare the performance of two machine learning models - FMCIB+XGBoost, a supervised model with domain-specific pretraining, and Dinov2+ABMIL, a self-supervised model with attention-based multiple-instance learning - on 3D lung nodule data from the Stanford Radiogenomics and Lung-CT-PT-Dx cohorts. In the task of KRAS and EGFR mutation detection, FMCIB+XGBoost consistently outperformed Dinov2+ABMIL, achieving accuracies of 0.846 and 0.883 for KRAS and EGFR mutations, respectively. In cancer staging, Dinov2+ABMIL demonstrated competitive generalization, achieving an accuracy of 0.797 for T-stage prediction in the Lung-CT-PT-Dx cohort, suggesting SSL's adaptability across diverse datasets. Our results emphasize the clinical utility of supervised models in mutation detection and highlight the potential of SSL to improve staging generalization, while identifying areas for enhancement in mutation sensitivity.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Trilemma of Truth in Large Language Models
OTSurv: A Novel Multiple Instance Learning Framework for Survival Prediction with Heterogeneity-aware Optimal Transport
Benchmarking histopathology foundation models in a multi-center dataset for skin cancer subtyping
MiCo: Multiple Instance Learning with Context-Aware Clustering for Whole Slide Image Analysis
HyperPath: Knowledge-Guided Hyperbolic Semantic Hierarchy Modeling for WSI Analysis
Do MIL Models Transfer?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.