SPaRC: A Spatial Pathfinding Reasoning Challenge
원문 초록
Existing reasoning datasets saturate and fail to test abstract, multi-step problems, especially pathfinding and complex rule constraint satisfaction. We introduce SPaRC (Spatial Pathfinding Reasoning Challenge), a dataset of 1,000 2D grid pathfinding puzzles to evaluate spatial and symbolic reasoning, requiring step-by-step planning with arithmetic and geometric rules. Humans achieve near-perfect accuracy (98.0%; 94.5% on hard puzzles), while the best reasoning models, such as o4-mini, struggle (15.8%; 1.1% on hard puzzles). Models often generate invalid paths (>50% of puzzles for o4-mini), and reasoning tokens reveal they make errors in navigation and spatial logic. Unlike humans, who take longer on hard puzzles, models fail to scale test-time compute with difficulty. Allowing models to make multiple solution attempts improves accuracy, suggesting potential for better spatial reasoning with improved training and efficient test-time scaling methods. SPaRC can be used as a window into models' spatial reasoning limitations and drive research toward new methods that excel in abstract, multi-step problem-solving.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Warehouse Spatial Question Answering with LLM Agent
Scaling RL to Long Videos
OST-Bench: Evaluating the Capabilities of MLLMs in Online Spatio-temporal Scene Understanding
ImplicitQA: Going beyond frames towards Implicit Video Reasoning
3D-Aware Vision-Language Models Fine-Tuning with Geometric Distillation
Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.