Is (Selective) Round-To-Nearest Quantization All You Need?
원문 초록
Quantization became a necessary tool for serving ever-increasing Large Language Models (LLMs). RTN (Round-to-Nearest) is perhaps the simplest quantization technique that has been around well before LLMs surged to the forefront of machine learning (ML) research. Yet, it has been largely dismissed by recent and more advanced quantization methods that claim superiority over RTN in nearly every aspect of performance. This work aims to dispel this established point of view, showing that RTN is not only much cheaper to apply, but also its token generation throughput can be better than and accuracy can be similar to more advanced alternatives. In particular, we discuss our implementation of RTN based on the recent Marlin kernels and demonstrate how the accuracy of RTN can be gradually improved by selectively increasing the data precision format of certain model layers and modules. Based on our results, we argue that RTN presents a viable and practical choice for quantizing LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FP4 All the Way: Fully Quantized Training of LLMs
Addition is almost all you need: Compressing neural networks with double binary factorization
An Extra RMSNorm is All You Need for Fine Tuning to 1.58 Bits
MGVQ: Could VQ-VAE Beat VAE? A Generalizable Tokenizer with Multi-group Quantization
Compress Any Segment Anything Model (SAM)
OpenDPDv2: A Unified Learning and Optimization Framework for Neural Network Digital Predistortion
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.