arXiv:2505.15623
Can LLMs $\textit{understand}$ Math? -- Exploring the Pitfalls in Mathematical Reasoning
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate considerable potential in various natural language tasks but face significant challenges in mathematical reasoning, particularly in executing precise, multi-step logic. However, current evaluation frameworks judge their performance solely based on accuracy, which only accounts for the final answer. This study explores these pitfalls by employing a novel evaluation framework. We propose an evaluation metric called the MAPLE score, which holistically quantifies reasoning misalignment by integrating error rates, redundancy, and validity.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
A Practical Two-Stage Recipe for Mathematical LLMs: Maximizing Accuracy with SFT and Efficiency with Reinforcement Learning
Confucius3-Math: A Lightweight High-Performance Reasoning LLM for Chinese K-12 Mathematics Learning
Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVR
RePO: Replay-Enhanced Policy Optimization
Vision Matters: Simple Visual Perturbations Can Boost Multimodal Math Reasoning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.