On the Robustness of Medical Vision-Language Models: Are they Truly Generalizable?
원문 초록
Medical Vision-Language Models (MVLMs) have achieved par excellence generalization in medical image analysis, yet their performance under noisy, corrupted conditions remains largely untested. Clinical imaging is inherently susceptible to acquisition artifacts and noise; however, existing evaluations predominantly assess generally clean datasets, overlooking robustness -- i.e., the model's ability to perform under real-world distortions. To address this gap, we first introduce MediMeta-C, a corruption benchmark that systematically applies several perturbations across multiple medical imaging datasets. Combined with MedMNIST-C, this establishes a comprehensive robustness evaluation framework for MVLMs. We further propose RobustMedCLIP, a visual encoder adaptation of a pretrained MVLM that incorporates few-shot tuning to enhance resilience against corruptions. Through extensive experiments, we benchmark 5 major MVLMs across 5 medical imaging modalities, revealing that existing models exhibit severe degradation under corruption and struggle with domain-modality tradeoffs. Our findings highlight the necessity of diverse training and robust adaptation strategies, demonstrating that efficient low-rank adaptation when paired with few-shot tuning, improves robustness while preserving generalization across modalities.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Taming Vision-Language Models for Medical Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
Conquering the Retina: Bringing Visual in-Context Learning to OCT
Autonomous Computer Vision Development with Agentic AI
SSS: Semi-Supervised SAM-2 with Efficient Prompting for Medical Imaging Segmentation
DrVD-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Reason Like Human Doctors in Medical Image Diagnosis?
Comparing the Effects of Persistence Barcodes Aggregation and Feature Concatenation on Medical Imaging
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.