Cheaper, Better, Faster, Stronger: Robust Text-to-SQL without Chain-of-Thought or Fine-Tuning
원문 초록
LLMs are effective at code generation tasks like text-to-SQL, but is it worth the cost? Many state-of-the-art approaches use non-task-specific LLM techniques including Chain-of-Thought (CoT), self-consistency, and fine-tuning. These methods can be costly at inference time, sometimes requiring over a hundred LLM calls with reasoning, incurring average costs of up to \$0.46 per query, while fine-tuning models can cost thousands of dollars. We introduce "N-rep" consistency, a more cost-efficient text-to-SQL approach that achieves similar BIRD benchmark scores as other more expensive methods, at only \$0.039 per query. N-rep leverages multiple representations of the same schema input to mitigate weaknesses in any single representation, making the solution more robust and allowing the use of smaller and cheaper models without any reasoning or fine-tuning. To our knowledge, N-rep is the best-performing text-to-SQL approach in its cost range.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Bridging the Gap Between Open-Source and Proprietary LLMs in Table QA
Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte Carlo
XiYan-SQL: A Novel Multi-Generator Framework For Text-to-SQL
Schema-R1: A reasoning training approach for schema linking in Text-to-SQL Task
SEED: Enhancing Text-to-SQL Performance and Practical Usability Through Automatic Evidence Generation
Reasoning-Table: Exploring Reinforcement Learning for Table Reasoning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.