Critique-Guided Distillation: Improving Supervised Fine-tuning via Better Distillation
원문 초록
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) using expert demonstrations often suffer from the imitation problem, where the model learns to reproduce the correct responses without \emph{understanding} the underlying rationale. To address this limitation, we propose \textsc{Critique-Guided Distillation (CGD)}, a novel multi-stage framework that integrates teacher model generated \emph{explanatory critiques} and \emph{refined responses} into the SFT process. A student model is then trained to map the triplet of prompt, teacher critique, and its own initial response to the corresponding refined teacher response, thereby learning both \emph{what} to imitate and \emph{why}. Using entropy-based analysis, we show that \textsc{CGD} reduces refinement uncertainty and can be interpreted as a Bayesian posterior update. We perform extensive empirical evaluation of \textsc{CGD}, on variety of benchmark tasks, and demonstrate significant gains on both math (AMC23 +17.5%) and language understanding tasks (MMLU-Pro +6.3%), while successfully mitigating the format drift issues observed in previous critique fine-tuning (CFT) techniques.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Delta Learning Hypothesis: Preference Tuning on Weak Data can Yield Strong Gains
SiLVR: A Simple Language-based Video Reasoning Framework
Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers
Training Step-Level Reasoning Verifiers with Formal Verification Tools
Warm Up Before You Train: Unlocking General Reasoning in Resource-Constrained Settings
HALO: Hierarchical Autonomous Logic-Oriented Orchestration for Multi-Agent LLM Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.