Building a Human-Verified Clinical Reasoning Dataset via a Human LLM Hybrid Pipeline for Trustworthy Medical AI
원문 초록
Despite strong performance in medical question-answering, the clinical adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is critically hampered by their opaque 'black-box' reasoning, limiting clinician trust. This challenge is compounded by the predominant reliance of current medical LLMs on corpora from scientific literature or synthetic data, which often lack the granular expert validation and high clinical relevance essential for advancing their specialized medical capabilities. To address these critical gaps, we introduce a highly clinically relevant dataset with 31,247 medical question-answer pairs, each accompanied by expert-validated chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations. This resource, spanning multiple clinical domains, was curated via a scalable human-LLM hybrid pipeline: LLM-generated rationales were iteratively reviewed, scored, and refined by medical experts against a structured rubric, with substandard outputs revised through human effort or guided LLM regeneration until expert consensus. This publicly available dataset provides a vital source for the development of medical LLMs that capable of transparent and verifiable reasoning, thereby advancing safer and more interpretable AI in medicine.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning
Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflection
AMQA: An Adversarial Dataset for Benchmarking Bias of LLMs in Medicine and Healthcare
Leveraging Online Data to Enhance Medical Knowledge in a Small Persian Language Model
From RAG to Agentic: Validating Islamic-Medicine Responses with LLM Agents
Instruction Tuning and CoT Prompting for Contextual Medical QA with LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.