Toward Reasonable Parrots: Why Large Language Models Should Argue with Us by Design
원문 초록
In this position paper, we advocate for the development of conversational technology that is inherently designed to support and facilitate argumentative processes. We argue that, at present, large language models (LLMs) are inadequate for this purpose, and we propose an ideal technology design aimed at enhancing argumentative skills. This involves re-framing LLMs as tools to exercise our critical thinking skills rather than replacing them. We introduce the concept of \textit{reasonable parrots} that embody the fundamental principles of relevance, responsibility, and freedom, and that interact through argumentative dialogical moves. These principles and moves arise out of millennia of work in argumentation theory and should serve as the starting point for LLM-based technology that incorporates basic principles of argumentation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems
JoFormer (Journey-based Transformer): Theory and Empirical Analysis on the Tiny Shakespeare Dataset
POSS: Position Specialist Generates Better Draft for Speculative Decoding
ComRoPE: Scalable and Robust Rotary Position Embedding Parameterized by Trainable Commuting Angle Matrices
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.