Evaluating Explanations: An Explanatory Virtues Framework for Mechanistic Interpretability -- The Strange Science Part I.ii
원문 초록
Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) aims to understand neural networks through causal explanations. Though MI has many explanation-generating methods, progress has been limited by the lack of a universal approach to evaluating explanations. Here we analyse the fundamental question "What makes a good explanation?" We introduce a pluralist Explanatory Virtues Framework drawing on four perspectives from the Philosophy of Science - the Bayesian, Kuhnian, Deutschian, and Nomological - to systematically evaluate and improve explanations in MI. We find that Compact Proofs consider many explanatory virtues and are hence a promising approach. Fruitful research directions implied by our framework include (1) clearly defining explanatory simplicity, (2) focusing on unifying explanations and (3) deriving universal principles for neural networks. Improved MI methods enhance our ability to monitor, predict, and steer AI systems.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLINBO: Trustworthy LLM-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization
Streaming 4D Visual Geometry Transformer
Simple is what you need for efficient and accurate medical image segmentation
Time Series Forecasting as Reasoning: A Slow-Thinking Approach with Reinforced LLMs
Sorrel: A simple and flexible framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning
On Denoising Walking Videos for Gait Recognition
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.