RAG LLMs are Not Safer: A Safety Analysis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models
원문 초록
Efforts to ensure the safety of large language models (LLMs) include safety fine-tuning, evaluation, and red teaming. However, despite the widespread use of the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, AI safety work focuses on standard LLMs, which means we know little about how RAG use cases change a model's safety profile. We conduct a detailed comparative analysis of RAG and non-RAG frameworks with eleven LLMs. We find that RAG can make models less safe and change their safety profile. We explore the causes of this change and find that even combinations of safe models with safe documents can cause unsafe generations. In addition, we evaluate some existing red teaming methods for RAG settings and show that they are less effective than when used for non-RAG settings. Our work highlights the need for safety research and red-teaming methods specifically tailored for RAG LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Sentinel: Decoding Context Utilization via Attention Probing for Efficient LLM Context Compression
Orchestrator-Agent Trust: A Modular Agentic AI Visual Classification System with Trust-Aware Orchestration and RAG-Based Reasoning
EraRAG: Efficient and Incremental Retrieval Augmented Generation for Growing Corpora
Response Quality Assessment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Conditional Conformal Factuality
Fine-Tuning and Prompt Engineering of LLMs, for the Creation of Multi-Agent AI for Addressing Sustainable Protein Production Challenges
MMSearch-R1: Incentivizing LMMs to Search
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.