Evaluating Test-Time Scaling LLMs for Legal Reasoning: OpenAI o1, DeepSeek-R1, and Beyond
원문 초록
Recently, Test-Time Scaling Large Language Models (LLMs), such as DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1, have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across various domains and tasks, particularly in reasoning. While these models have shown impressive performance on general language tasks, their effectiveness in specialized fields like legal remains unclear. To address this, we present a preliminary evaluation of LLMs in various legal scenarios, covering both Chinese and English legal tasks. Our analysis includes 9 LLMs and 17 legal tasks, with a focus on newly published and more complex challenges such as multi-defendant legal judgments and legal argument reasoning. Our findings indicate that, despite DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 being among the most powerful models, their legal reasoning capabilities are still lacking. Specifically, these models score below 80\% on seven Chinese legal reasoning tasks and below 80\% on two English legal reasoning tasks. This suggests that, even among the most advanced reasoning models, legal reasoning abilities remain underdeveloped.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Can ChatGPT Perform Reasoning Using the IRAC Method in Analyzing Legal Scenarios Like a Lawyer?
LLM-based HSE Compliance Assessment: Benchmark, Performance, and Advancements
Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use
CaseGen: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Legal Case Documents Generation
JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning
NitiBench: A Comprehensive Studies of LLM Frameworks Capabilities for Thai Legal Question Answering
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.