Can one size fit all?: Measuring Failure in Multi-Document Summarization Domain Transfer
원문 초록
Abstractive multi-document summarization (MDS) is the task of automatically summarizing information in multiple documents, from news articles to conversations with multiple speakers. The training approaches for current MDS models can be grouped into four approaches: end-to-end with special pre-training ("direct"), chunk-then-summarize, extract-then-summarize, and inference with GPT-style models. In this work, we evaluate MDS models across training approaches, domains, and dimensions (reference similarity, quality, and factuality), to analyze how and why models trained on one domain can fail to summarize documents from another (News, Science, and Conversation) in the zero-shot domain transfer setting. We define domain-transfer "failure" as a decrease in factuality, higher deviation from the target, and a general decrease in summary quality. In addition to exploring domain transfer for MDS models, we examine potential issues with applying popular summarization metrics out-of-the-box.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
GenerationPrograms: Fine-grained Attribution with Executable Programs
Improving Fairness of Large Language Models in Multi-document Summarization
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
Estimating Optimal Context Length for Hybrid Retrieval-augmented Multi-document Summarization
ARC: Argument Representation and Coverage Analysis for Zero-Shot Long Document Summarization with Instruction Following LLMs
A Unified Retrieval Framework with Document Ranking and EDU Filtering for Multi-document Summarization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.