The Box is in the Pen: Evaluating Commonsense Reasoning in Neural Machine Translation
원문 초록
Does neural machine translation yield translations that are congenial with common sense? In this paper, we present a test suite to evaluate the commonsense reasoning capability of neural machine translation. The test suite consists of three test sets, covering lexical and contextless/contextual syntactic ambiguity that requires commonsense knowledge to resolve. We manually create 1,200 triples, each of which contain a source sentence and two contrastive translations, involving 7 different common sense types. Language models pretrained on large-scale corpora, such as BERT, GPT-2, achieve a commonsense reasoning accuracy of lower than 72% on target translations of this test suite. We conduct extensive experiments on the test suite to evaluate commonsense reasoning in neural machine translation and investigate factors that have impact on this capability. Our experiments and analyses demonstrate that neural machine translation performs poorly on commonsense reasoning of the three ambiguity types in terms of both reasoning accuracy (60.1%) and reasoning consistency (31%). The built commonsense test suite is available at https://github.com/tjunlp-lab/CommonMT.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation
ConECT Dataset: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Context-Aware E-Commerce MT
Building a Functional Machine Translation Corpus for Kpelle
Combining the Best of Both Worlds: A Method for Hybrid NMT and LLM Translation
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.