FINEREASON: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle Solving
원문 초록
Many challenging reasoning tasks require not just rapid, intuitive responses, but a more deliberate, multi-step approach. Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) highlights an important shift from the "System 1" way of quick reactions to the "System 2" style of reflection-and-correction problem solving. However, current benchmarks heavily rely on the final-answer accuracy, leaving much of a model's intermediate reasoning steps unexamined. This fails to assess the model's ability to reflect and rectify mistakes within the reasoning process. To bridge this gap, we introduce FINEREASON, a logic-puzzle benchmark for fine-grained evaluation of LLMs' reasoning capabilities. Each puzzle can be decomposed into atomic steps, making it ideal for rigorous validation of intermediate correctness. Building on this, we introduce two tasks: state checking, and state transition, for a comprehensive evaluation of how models assess the current situation and plan the next move. To support broader research, we also provide a puzzle training set aimed at enhancing performance on general mathematical tasks. We show that models trained on our state checking and transition data demonstrate gains in math reasoning by up to 5.1% on GSM8K.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
AgentGroupChat-V2: Divide-and-Conquer Is What LLM-Based Multi-Agent System Need
Learning a Continue-Thinking Token for Enhanced Test-Time Scaling
Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models
EquivPruner: Boosting Efficiency and Quality in LLM-Based Search via Action Pruning
Seek in the Dark: Reasoning via Test-Time Instance-Level Policy Gradient in Latent Space
Thinkless: LLM Learns When to Think
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.