All You Need for Counterfactual Explainability Is Principled and Reliable Estimate of Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty
원문 초록
This position paper argues that, to its detriment, transparency research overlooks many foundational concepts of artificial intelligence. Here, we focus on uncertainty quantification -- in the context of ante-hoc interpretability and counterfactual explainability -- showing how its adoption could address key challenges in the field. First, we posit that uncertainty and ante-hoc interpretability offer complementary views of the same underlying idea; second, we assert that uncertainty provides a principled unifying framework for counterfactual explainability. Consequently, inherently transparent models can benefit from human-centred explanatory insights -- like counterfactuals -- which are otherwise missing. At a higher level, integrating artificial intelligence fundamentals into transparency research promises to yield more reliable, robust and understandable predictive models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agents
Statistical Machine Learning for Astronomy -- A Textbook
Interpretable Bayesian Tensor Network Kernel Machines with Automatic Rank and Feature Selection
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
Estimating prevalence with precision and accuracy
UQLM: A Python Package for Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.