InductionBench: LLMs Fail in the Simplest Complexity Class
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable improvements in reasoning and many existing benchmarks have been addressed by models such as o1 and o3 either fully or partially. However, a majority of these benchmarks emphasize deductive reasoning, including mathematical and coding tasks in which rules such as mathematical axioms or programming syntax are clearly defined, based on which LLMs can plan and apply these rules to arrive at a solution. In contrast, inductive reasoning, where one infers the underlying rules from observed data, remains less explored. Such inductive processes lie at the heart of scientific discovery, as they enable researchers to extract general principles from empirical observations. To assess whether LLMs possess this capacity, we introduce InductionBench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the inductive reasoning ability of LLMs. Our experimental findings reveal that even the most advanced models available struggle to master the simplest complexity classes within the subregular hierarchy of functions, highlighting a notable deficiency in current LLMs' inductive reasoning capabilities. Coda and data are available https://github.com/Wenyueh/inductive_reasoning_benchmark.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Open Source Planning & Control System with Language Agents for Autonomous Scientific Discovery
STRUCTSENSE: A Task-Agnostic Agentic Framework for Structured Information Extraction with Human-In-The-Loop Evaluation and Benchmarking
From Reproduction to Replication: Evaluating Research Agents with Progressive Code Masking
LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research
ClimateChat: Designing Data and Methods for Instruction Tuning LLMs to Answer Climate Change Queries
HSG-12M: A Large-Scale Spatial Multigraph Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.