Where's the Bug? Attention Probing for Scalable Fault Localization
원문 초록
Ensuring code correctness remains a challenging problem even as large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable at code-related tasks. While LLM-based program repair systems can propose bug fixes using only a user's bug report, their effectiveness is fundamentally limited by their ability to perform fault localization (FL), a challenging problem for both humans and LLMs. Existing FL approaches rely on executable test cases, require training on costly and often noisy line-level annotations, or demand resource-intensive LLMs. In this paper, we present Bug Attention Probe (BAP), a method which learns state-of-the-art fault localization without any direct localization labels, outperforming traditional FL baselines and prompting of large-scale LLMs. We evaluate our approach across a variety of code settings, including real-world Java bugs from the standard Defects4J dataset as well as seven other datasets which span a diverse set of bug types and languages. Averaged across all eight datasets, BAP improves by 34.6% top-1 accuracy compared to the strongest baseline and 93.4% over zero-shot prompting GPT-4o. BAP is also significantly more efficient than prompting, outperforming large open-weight models at a small fraction of the computational cost.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Integrating Various Software Artifacts for Better LLM-based Bug Localization and Program Repair
HyperAgent: Generalist Software Engineering Agents to Solve Coding Tasks at Scale
Aligning the Objective of LLM-based Program Repair
AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement
Dynamic Neural Program Embedding for Program Repair
The Impact of Input Order Bias on Large Language Models for Software Fault Localization
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.