Theorem Prover as a Judge for Synthetic Data Generation
원문 초록
The demand for synthetic data in mathematical reasoning has increased due to its potential to enhance the mathematical capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, ensuring the validity of intermediate reasoning steps remains a significant challenge, affecting data quality. While formal verification via theorem provers effectively validates LLM reasoning, the autoformalisation of mathematical proofs remains error-prone. In response, we introduce iterative autoformalisation, an approach that iteratively refines theorem prover formalisation to mitigate errors, thereby increasing the execution rate on the Lean prover from 60% to 87%. Building upon that, we introduce Theorem Prover as a Judge (TP-as-a-Judge), a method that employs theorem prover formalisation to rigorously assess LLM intermediate reasoning, effectively integrating autoformalisation with synthetic data generation. Finally, we present Reinforcement Learning from Theorem Prover Feedback (RLTPF), a framework that replaces human annotation with theorem prover feedback in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Across multiple LLMs, applying TP-as-a-Judge and RLTPF improves benchmarks with only 3,508 samples, achieving 5.56% accuracy gain on Mistral-7B for MultiArith, 6.00% on Llama-2-7B for SVAMP, and 3.55% on Llama-3.1-8B for AQUA.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
LogicPuzzleRL: Cultivating Robust Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline
Layer Importance for Mathematical Reasoning is Forged in Pre-Training and Invariant after Post-Training
Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning
Reasoning on a Budget: Miniaturizing DeepSeek R1 with SFT-GRPO Alignment for Instruction-Tuned LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.