ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews
원문 초록
The escalating volume of academic research, coupled with a shortage of qualified reviewers, necessitates innovative approaches to peer review. While large language model (LLMs) offer potential for automating this process, their current limitations include superficial critiques, hallucinations, and a lack of actionable insights. This research addresses these challenges by introducing a comprehensive evaluation framework for AI-generated reviews, that measures alignment with human evaluations, verifies factual accuracy, assesses analytical depth, and identifies actionable insights. We also propose a novel alignment mechanism that tailors LLM-generated reviews to the unique evaluation priorities of individual conferences and journals. To enhance the quality of these reviews, we introduce a self-refinement loop that iteratively optimizes the LLM's review prompts. Our framework establishes standardized metrics for evaluating AI-based review systems, thereby bolstering the reliability of AI-generated reviews in academic research.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Specification-based Security Evaluation of Real-World Agents Tool-Calling under Long-Horizon Context Tasks
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
Open Source Planning & Control System with Language Agents for Autonomous Scientific Discovery
Detecting Referring Expressions in Visually Grounded Dialogue with Autoregressive Language Models
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
AgentStealth: Reinforcing Large Language Model for Anonymizing User-generated Text
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.