HellaSwag-Pro: A Large-Scale Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoning
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in commonsense reasoning; however, some variations in questions can trigger incorrect responses. Do these models truly understand commonsense knowledge, or just memorize expression patterns? To investigate this question, we present the first extensive robustness evaluation of LLMs in commonsense reasoning. We introduce HellaSwag-Pro, a large-scale bilingual benchmark consisting of 11,200 cases, by designing and compiling seven types of question variants. To construct this benchmark, we propose a two-stage method to develop Chinese HellaSwag, a finely annotated dataset comprising 12,000 instances across 56 categories. We conduct extensive experiments on 41 representative LLMs, revealing that these LLMs are far from robust in commonsense reasoning. Furthermore, this robustness varies depending on the language in which the LLM is tested. This work establishes a high-quality evaluation benchmark, with extensive experiments offering valuable insights to the community in commonsense reasoning for LLMs.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Simulating Training Data Leakage in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for LLM Evaluation
What the HellaSwag? On the Validity of Common-Sense Reasoning Benchmarks
FinerWeb-10BT: Refining Web Data with LLM-Based Line-Level Filtering
LoRA Done RITE: Robust Invariant Transformation Equilibration for LoRA Optimization
You can remove GPT2's LayerNorm by fine-tuning
$\texttt{metabench}$ -- A Sparse Benchmark to Measure General Ability in Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.