Show Me the Work: Fact-Checkers' Requirements for Explainable Automated Fact-Checking
원문 초록
The pervasiveness of large language models and generative AI in online media has amplified the need for effective automated fact-checking to assist fact-checkers in tackling the increasing volume and sophistication of misinformation. The complex nature of fact-checking demands that automated fact-checking systems provide explanations that enable fact-checkers to scrutinise their outputs. However, it is unclear how these explanations should align with the decision-making and reasoning processes of fact-checkers to be effectively integrated into their workflows. Through semi-structured interviews with fact-checking professionals, we bridge this gap by: (i) providing an account of how fact-checkers assess evidence, make decisions, and explain their processes; (ii) examining how fact-checkers use automated tools in practice; and (iii) identifying fact-checker explanation requirements for automated fact-checking tools. The findings show unmet explanation needs and identify important criteria for replicable fact-checking explanations that trace the model's reasoning path, reference specific evidence, and highlight uncertainty and information gaps.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
RealFactBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Real-World Fact-Checking
SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing
LLM-Stackelberg Games: Conjectural Reasoning Equilibria and Their Applications to Spearphishing
Veracity: An Open-Source AI Fact-Checking System
In Crowd Veritas: Leveraging Human Intelligence To Fight Misinformation
Combating Misinformation in the Arab World: Challenges & Opportunities
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.