Detection of Physiological Data Tampering Attacks with Quantum Machine Learning
원문 초록
The widespread use of cloud-based medical devices and wearable sensors has made physiological data susceptible to tampering. These attacks can compromise the reliability of healthcare systems which can be critical and life-threatening. Detection of such data tampering is of immediate need. Machine learning has been used to detect anomalies in datasets but the performance of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is still yet to be evaluated for physiological sensor data. Thus, our study compares the effectiveness of QML for detecting physiological data tampering, focusing on two types of white-box attacks: data poisoning and adversarial perturbation. The results show that QML models are better at identifying label-flipping attacks, achieving accuracy rates of 75%-95% depending on the data and attack severity. This superior performance is due to the ability of quantum algorithms to handle complex and high-dimensional data. However, both QML and classical models struggle to detect more sophisticated adversarial perturbation attacks, which subtly alter data without changing its statistical properties. Although QML performed poorly against this attack with around 45%-65% accuracy, it still outperformed classical algorithms in some cases.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Adversarial Data Poisoning Attacks on Quantum Machine Learning in the NISQ Era
Addressing The Devastating Effects Of Single-Task Data Poisoning In Exemplar-Free Continual Learning
The interplay of robustness and generalization in quantum machine learning
VLMs Can Aggregate Scattered Training Patches
Qiskit Machine Learning: an open-source library for quantum machine learning tasks at scale on quantum hardware and classical simulators
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.