How Inclusively do LMs Perceive Social and Moral Norms?
원문 초록
This paper discusses and contains offensive content. Language models (LMs) are used in decision-making systems and as interactive assistants. However, how well do these models making judgements align with the diversity of human values, particularly regarding social and moral norms? In this work, we investigate how inclusively LMs perceive norms across demographic groups (e.g., gender, age, and income). We prompt 11 LMs on rules-of-thumb (RoTs) and compare their outputs with the existing responses of 100 human annotators. We introduce the Absolute Distance Alignment Metric (ADA-Met) to quantify alignment on ordinal questions. We find notable disparities in LM responses, with younger, higher-income groups showing closer alignment, raising concerns about the representation of marginalized perspectives. Our findings highlight the importance of further efforts to make LMs more inclusive of diverse human values. The code and prompts are available on GitHub under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Perceptual Rationality: An Evolutionary Game Theory of Perceptually Rational Decision-Making
REMoH: A Reflective Evolution of Multi-objective Heuristics approach via Large Language Models
Boosting Deep Ensemble Performance with Hierarchical Pruning
Graph-Structured Data Analysis of Component Failure in Autonomous Cargo Ships Based on Feature Fusion
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Step-wise Policy for Rare-tool Knowledge (SPaRK): Offline RL that Drives Diverse Tool Use in LLMs
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.