Vulnerability Mitigation for Safety-Aligned Language Models via Debiasing
원문 초록
Safety alignment is an essential research topic for real-world AI applications. Despite the multifaceted nature of safety and trustworthiness in AI, current safety alignment methods often focus on a comprehensive notion of safety. By carefully assessing models from the existing safety-alignment methods, we found that, while they generally improved overall safety performance, they failed to ensure safety in specific categories. Our study first identified the difficulty of eliminating such vulnerabilities without sacrificing the model's helpfulness. We observed that, while smaller KL penalty parameters, increased training iterations, and dataset cleansing can enhance safety, they do not necessarily improve the trade-off between safety and helpfulness. We discovered that safety alignment could even induce undesired effects and result in a model that prefers generating negative tokens leading to rejective responses, regardless of the input context. To address this, we introduced a learning-free method, Token-level Safety-Debiased Inference (TSDI), to estimate and correct this bias during the generation process using randomly constructed prompts. Our experiments demonstrated that our method could enhance the model's helpfulness while maintaining safety, thus improving the trade-off Pareto-front.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Devil behind the mask: An emergent safety vulnerability of Diffusion LLMs
Safe Pruning LoRA: Robust Distance-Guided Pruning for Safety Alignment in Adaptation of LLMs
Probing the Robustness of Large Language Models Safety to Latent Perturbations
Probe before You Talk: Towards Black-box Defense against Backdoor Unalignment for Large Language Models
Mitigating Safety Fallback in Editing-based Backdoor Injection on LLMs
Monitoring Decomposition Attacks in LLMs with Lightweight Sequential Monitors
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.