SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-training
원문 초록
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) are widely used post-training techniques for foundation models. However, their roles in enhancing model generalization capabilities remain unclear. This paper studies the difference between SFT and RL on generalization and memorization, focusing on text-based rule variants and visual variants. We introduce GeneralPoints, an arithmetic reasoning card game, and adopt V-IRL, a real-world navigation environment, to assess how models trained with SFT and RL generalize to unseen variants in both textual and visual domains. We show that RL, especially when trained with an outcome-based reward, generalizes across both rule-based textual and visual variants. SFT, in contrast, tends to memorize training data and struggles to generalize out-of-distribution scenarios. Further analysis reveals that RL improves the model's underlying visual recognition capabilities, contributing to its enhanced generalization in the visual domain. Despite RL's superior generalization, we show that SFT remains essential for effective RL training; SFT stabilizes the model's output format, enabling subsequent RL to achieve its performance gains. These findings demonstrates the capability of RL for acquiring generalizable knowledge in complex, multi-modal tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
Listener-Rewarded Thinking in VLMs for Image Preferences
Robots and Children that Learn Together : Improving Knowledge Retention by Teaching Peer-Like Interactive Robots
Learning-at-Criticality in Large Language Models for Quantum Field Theory and Beyond
High-Throughput Distributed Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Policy Synchronization
Personalized Exercise Recommendation with Semantically-Grounded Knowledge Tracing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.