Robust Counterfactual Explanations under Model Multiplicity Using Multi-Objective Optimization
원문 초록
In recent years, explainability in machine learning has gained importance. In this context, counterfactual explanation (CE), which is an explanation method that uses examples, has attracted attention. However, it has been pointed out that CE is not robust when there are multiple machine-learning models with similar accuracy. These problems are important when using machine learning to make safe decisions. In this paper, we propose robust CEs that introduce a new viewpoint -- Pareto improvement -- and a method that uses multi-objective optimization to generate it. To evaluate the proposed method, we conducted experiments using both simulated and real data. The results demonstrate that the proposed method is both robust and practical. This study highlights the potential of ensuring robustness in decision-making by applying the concept of social welfare. We believe that this research can serve as a valuable foundation for various fields, including explainability in machine learning, decision-making, and action planning based on machine learning.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Turning Sand to Gold: Recycling Data to Bridge On-Policy and Off-Policy Learning via Causal Bound
Social Group Bias in AI Finance
CF-Seg: Counterfactuals meet Segmentation
The Role of Explanation Styles and Perceived Accuracy on Decision Making in Predictive Process Monitoring
Going from a Representative Agent to Counterfactuals in Combinatorial Choice
DiCoFlex: Model-agnostic diverse counterfactuals with flexible control
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.