Private Selection with Heterogeneous Sensitivities
원문 초록
Differentially private (DP) selection involves choosing a high-scoring candidate from a finite candidate pool, where each score depends on a sensitive dataset. This problem arises naturally in a variety of contexts including model selection, hypothesis testing, and within many DP algorithms. Classical methods, such as Report Noisy Max (RNM), assume all candidates' scores are equally sensitive to changes in a single individual's data, but this often isn't the case. To address this, algorithms like the Generalised Exponential Mechanism (GEM) leverage variability in candidate sensitivities. However, we observe that while these algorithms can outperform RNM in some situations, they may underperform in others - they can even perform worse than random selection. In this work, we explore how the distribution of scores and sensitivities impacts DP selection mechanisms. In all settings we study, we find that there exists a mechanism that utilises heterogeneity in the candidate sensitivities that outperforms standard mechanisms like RNM. However, no single mechanism uniformly outperforms RNM. We propose using the correlation between the scores and sensitivities as the basis for deciding which DP selection mechanism to use. Further, we design a slight variant of GEM, modified GEM that generally performs well whenever GEM performs poorly. Relying on the correlation heuristic we propose combined GEM, which adaptively chooses between GEM and modified GEM and outperforms both in polarised settings.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
The use of cross validation in the analysis of designed experiments
Router-R1: Teaching LLMs Multi-Round Routing and Aggregation via Reinforcement Learning
Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learning
Behavioral Augmentation of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Method Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.