Why Are Positional Encodings Nonessential for Deep Autoregressive Transformers? Revisiting a Petroglyph
원문 초록
Do autoregressive Transformer language models require explicit positional encodings (PEs)? The answer is "no" as long as they have more than one layer -- they can distinguish sequences with permuted tokens without requiring explicit PEs. This property has been known since early efforts (those contemporary with GPT-2) adopting the Transformer for language modeling. However, this result does not appear to have been well disseminated and was even rediscovered recently. This may be partially due to a sudden growth of the language modeling community after the advent of GPT-2, but perhaps also due to the lack of a clear explanation in prior publications, despite being commonly understood by practitioners in the past. Here we review this long-forgotten explanation why explicit PEs are nonessential for multi-layer autoregressive Transformers (in contrast, one-layer models require PEs to discern order information of their input tokens). We also review the origin of this result, and hope to re-establish it as a common knowledge.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Specification-based Security Evaluation of Real-World Agents Tool-Calling under Long-Horizon Context Tasks
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
InstructFLIP: Exploring Unified Vision-Language Model for Face Anti-spoofing
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
Kodezi Chronos: A Debugging-First Language Model for Repository-Scale, Memory-Driven Code Understanding
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.