LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning
원문 초록
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across a myriad of tasks, yet they occasionally yield undesirable outputs. We posit that these limitations are rooted in the foundational autoregressive architecture of LLMs, which inherently lacks mechanisms for differentiating between desirable and undesirable results. Drawing inspiration from the dual-process theory of human cognition, we introduce LLM2, a novel framework that combines an LLM (System 1) with a process-based verifier (System 2). Within LLM2, the LLM is responsible for generating plausible candidates, while the verifier provides timely process-based feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs. The verifier is trained with a pairwise comparison loss on synthetic process-supervision data generated through our token quality exploration strategy. Empirical results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of LLM2, exemplified by an accuracy enhancement from 50.3 to 57.8 (+7.5) for Llama3-1B on GSM8K. Furthermore, when combined with self-consistency, LLM2 achieves additional improvements, boosting major@20 accuracy from 56.2 to 70.2 (+14.0).
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models
EquivPruner: Boosting Efficiency and Quality in LLM-Based Search via Action Pruning
Rewriting Pre-Training Data Boosts LLM Performance in Math and Code
KisMATH: Do LLMs Have Knowledge of Implicit Structures in Mathematical Reasoning?
CoRE: Enhancing Metacognition with Label-free Self-evaluation in LRMs
Xolver: Multi-Agent Reasoning with Holistic Experience Learning Just Like an Olympiad Team
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.