Machine Generated Product Advertisements: Benchmarking LLMs Against Human Performance
원문 초록
This study compares the performance of AI-generated and human-written product descriptions using a multifaceted evaluation model. We analyze descriptions for 100 products generated by four AI models (Gemma 2B, LLAMA, GPT2, and ChatGPT 4) with and without sample descriptions, against human-written descriptions. Our evaluation metrics include sentiment, readability, persuasiveness, Search Engine Optimization(SEO), clarity, emotional appeal, and call-to-action effectiveness. The results indicate that ChatGPT 4 performs the best. In contrast, other models demonstrate significant shortcomings, producing incoherent and illogical output that lacks logical structure and contextual relevance. These models struggle to maintain focus on the product being described, resulting in disjointed sentences that do not convey meaningful information. This research provides insights into the current capabilities and limitations of AI in the creation of content for e-Commerce.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
B-XAIC Dataset: Benchmarking Explainable AI for Graph Neural Networks Using Chemical Data
SenseShift6D: Multimodal RGB-D Benchmarking for Robust 6D Pose Estimation across Environment and Sensor Variations
DVFL-Net: A Lightweight Distilled Video Focal Modulation Network for Spatio-Temporal Action Recognition
DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
FLsim: A Modular and Library-Agnostic Simulation Framework for Federated Learning
DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.