How Propense Are Large Language Models at Producing Code Smells? A Benchmarking Study
원문 초록
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in automating software engineering tasks, particularly in code generation. However, current evaluation benchmarks, which primarily focus on accuracy, fall short in assessing the quality of the code generated by these models, specifically their tendency to produce code smells. To address this limitation, we introduce CodeSmellEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate the propensity of LLMs for generating code smells. Our benchmark includes a novel metric: Propensity Smelly Score (PSC), and a curated dataset of method-level code smells: CodeSmellData. To demonstrate the use of CodeSmellEval, we conducted a case study with two state-of-the-art LLMs, CodeLlama and Mistral. The results reveal that both models tend to generate code smells, such as simplifiable-condition and consider-merging-isinstance. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our benchmark in evaluating LLMs, providing valuable insights into their reliability and their propensity to introduce code smells in code generation tasks.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Tasks
CodeAssistBench (CAB): Dataset & Benchmarking for Multi-turn Chat-Based Code Assistance
CORE: Benchmarking LLMs Code Reasoning Capabilities through Static Analysis Tasks
QHackBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Quantum Code Generation Using PennyLane Hackathon Challenges
Reasoning as a Resource: Optimizing Fast and Slow Thinking in Code Generation Models
CETBench: A Novel Dataset constructed via Transformations over Programs for Benchmarking LLMs for Code-Equivalence Checking
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.