System-2 Mathematical Reasoning via Enriched Instruction Tuning
원문 초록
Solving complex mathematical problems via system-2 reasoning is a natural human skill, yet it remains a significant challenge for current large language models (LLMs). We identify the scarcity of deliberate multi-step reasoning data as a primary limiting factor. To this end, we introduce Enriched Instruction Tuning (EIT), a method that enriches existing human-annotated mathematical datasets by synergizing human and AI feedback to create fine-grained reasoning trajectories. These datasets are then used to fine-tune open-source LLMs, enhancing their mathematical reasoning abilities without reliance on any symbolic verification program. Concretely, EIT is composed of two critical steps: Enriching with Reasoning Plan (ERP) and Enriching with Reasoning Step (ERS). The former generates a high-level plan that breaks down complex instructions into a sequence of simpler objectives, while ERS fills in reasoning contexts often overlooked by human annotators, creating a smoother reasoning trajectory for LLM fine-tuning. Unlike existing CoT prompting methods that generate reasoning chains only depending on LLM's internal knowledge, our method leverages human-annotated initial answers as ``meta-knowledge'' to help LLMs generate more detailed and precise reasoning processes, leading to a more trustworthy LLM expert for complex mathematical problems. In experiments, EIT achieves an accuracy of 84.1% on GSM8K and 32.5% on MATH, surpassing state-of-the-art fine-tuning and prompting methods, and even matching the performance of tool-augmented methods.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models
EquivPruner: Boosting Efficiency and Quality in LLM-Based Search via Action Pruning
CoRE: Enhancing Metacognition with Label-free Self-evaluation in LRMs
Xolver: Multi-Agent Reasoning with Holistic Experience Learning Just Like an Olympiad Team
Learning to Rank Chain-of-Thought: An Energy-Based Approach with Outcome Supervision
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.