Meta-evaluating stability measures: MAX-Senstivity & AVG-Sensitivity
원문 초록
The use of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) systems has introduced a set of challenges that need resolution. The XAI robustness, or stability, has been one of the goals of the community from its beginning. Multiple authors have proposed evaluating this feature using objective evaluation measures. Nonetheless, many questions remain. With this work, we propose a novel approach to meta-evaluate these metrics, i.e. analyze the correctness of the evaluators. We propose two new tests that allowed us to evaluate two different stability measures: AVG-Sensitiviy and MAX-Senstivity. We tested their reliability in the presence of perfect and robust explanations, generated with a Decision Tree; as well as completely random explanations and prediction. The metrics results showed their incapacity of identify as erroneous the random explanations, highlighting their overall unreliability.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Communicating Smartly in the Molecular Domain: Neural Networks in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
Do Protein Transformers Have Biological Intelligence?
TIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation
Addressing the Scarcity of Benchmarks for Graph XAI
Heart2Mind: Human-Centered Contestable Psychiatric Disorder Diagnosis System using Wearable ECG Monitors
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.