Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Analysis of Explainability Methods in Skin Lesion Classifiers
원문 초록
Deep Learning has shown outstanding results in computer vision tasks; healthcare is no exception. However, there is no straightforward way to expose the decision-making process of DL models. Good accuracy is not enough for skin cancer predictions. Understanding the model's behavior is crucial for clinical application and reliable outcomes. In this work, we identify desiderata for explanations in skin-lesion models. We analyzed seven methods, four based on pixel-attribution (Grad-CAM, Score-CAM, LIME, SHAP) and three on high-level concepts (ACE, ICE, CME), for a deep neural network trained on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration Archive. Our findings indicate that while these techniques reveal biases, there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of explanations to achieve transparency in skin-lesion models.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Graph-Structured Data Analysis of Component Failure in Autonomous Cargo Ships Based on Feature Fusion
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
InvestAlign: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Aligning Large Language Models with Investor Decision-Making Processes under Herd Behavior
VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systems
Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Causal Influence Prompting
NavMorph: A Self-Evolving World Model for Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environments
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.