A 2-step Framework for Automated Literary Translation Evaluation: Its Promises and Pitfalls
원문 초록
In this work, we propose and evaluate the feasibility of a two-stage pipeline to evaluate literary machine translation, in a fine-grained manner, from English to Korean. The results show that our framework provides fine-grained, interpretable metrics suited for literary translation and obtains a higher correlation with human judgment than traditional machine translation metrics. Nonetheless, it still fails to match inter-human agreement, especially in metrics like Korean Honorifics. We also observe that LLMs tend to favor translations generated by other LLMs, and we highlight the necessity of developing more sophisticated evaluation methods to ensure accurate and culturally sensitive machine translation of literary works.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
Gender Bias in English-to-Greek Machine Translation
TACTIC: Translation Agents with Cognitive-Theoretic Interactive Collaboration
Translate With Care: Addressing Gender Bias, Neutrality, and Reasoning in Large Language Model Translations
Should I Share this Translation? Evaluating Quality Feedback for User Reliance on Machine Translation
Unsupervised Word-level Quality Estimation for Machine Translation Through the Lens of Annotators (Dis)agreement
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.